Pupil Premium Grant Plan 2016-17
 Overview of the school:
Number of pupils and pupil premium grant (PPG) received 2016	
Total number of pupils on roll (PLASC Jan 2016)	610	
Total number of pupils eligible for PPG	363 (60%)	
Amount of PPG received per pupil 	(Averaged to) £992.91	
Total amount of PPG received 2015/2016	£360,425	

Nature of Support 2016/17:
•	Small group tuition for identified students in English and Maths
•	Support pupils through inclusion in trips, visits and extra curricula activities
•	Coaching for progress
•	Additional staffing to coordinate the programmes and monitor the progress of funded pupils and identified areas by creating regular reports and evaluation documents
•	Additional staffing to decrease class sizes
•	Additional dedicated learning support assistant to work with students both in class and during breaks
•	Create links with families to identify individual needs through our parental support advisor
•	Support with music tuition in the form of bursaries
•	Enrichment activities to boost aspirations and experience
•	Train peer tutors to help other students with their learning
•	Embed curriculum support for identified pupils
•	Opportunities to visit universities to raise aspirations
•	Identify areas in need of intervention such as attendance, literacy, numeracy, behaviour and life skills
Curriculum Focus on PP spend 2015/16: 
Strategy	Cost (£)	
Academic mentors are used run intervention with students. This can take the form of one to one intervention or small group intervention. These have been sighted as having a positive impact from the education endowment fund. 	60800	
50% of an AVP with Specific focus on PP	30000	
CPD/Training - PP Speaker	4500	
PP Plans for each department	6025	
Performance management targets. are now specifically including the progress of PP students.	0	
Targets have been set at 4LOP for PP students to aid closing of the gap and aid the acceleration of progress.	0	
Half termly book scrutiny’s to take place with students.  	0	
Tracking stickers to be produced and printed.	500	
EEF research used for interventions.	0	
CPD about marking and feedback to continue.	0	
Half termly PP book scrutiny’s to take place with students. 	0	
Reading intervention, carried out in small groups by EAL TA’s (max 4:1 ratio) is essential in ensuring students can participate fully in mainstream classes, and make the most progress.	2070	
2 X TA’s to carry out reading intervention.	47300	
Strategy needed to track pupil behaviour by group, but specifically with a Pupil Premium focus. 60% of APL time - £28500 x 5	85500	
Monitoring and tracking of Attendance with a specific focus on PP (via Sol Attendance)	3000	
Mancunian Way Challenge and Support Project 	10200	
Academic mentors in Maths, English and Science	91200	
Additional progress leaders (3x£9000) TLR so that each year group has a teaching member of staff monitoring and supporting PP	27000	
To design and implement a flight path tracker so students can track their progress in a subject. 	400	
Improve the Alternative Provision in the Academy by employing an AP manager at grade 6	28500	
Uniform	10000	
Equipment	500	
Trips	5000	
Educational psychologist 	7000	
Total PP Spend	£419495	

Measuring the Impact of PP spend 2015/16: 
Pupils entitled to the pupil premium are tracked extensively throughout their time at school Heads of Department are held to account for the progress of PP students in Line Management meetings, so that we can see how they doing in comparison to their peers. 

IMPACT - Pupil Premium Indicators of Achievement & Attendance	
																	
							All Students 	All Students Excl AP Students	
INDICATORS OF ACHIEVEMENT IMPACT AT KS4	2015	2016	2016	
	All	PP	NPP	Gap PP v NPP	Gap School PP v National NPP	All	PP	NPP	Gap PP v NPP	Gap School PP v National NPP	All	PP	NPP	Gap PP v NPP	Gap School PP v National NPP	
5A*-C EM	School	28	23	38	-15	-40	25	24	28	-4	-39	30	30	29	1	-33	
	National	56	36	63	-27		56	36	63	-27		56	36	63	-27		
	Gap	-28	-13	-25	12		-31	-12	-35	23		-26	-6	-34	28		
Progress 8	School	-0.1	-0.1	0	-0.1	 	-0.64	-0.93	0.41	-1.34	 	-0.02	-0.22	0.59	-0.81	 	
										
Data for 2015 showed that we did better than the National average for our outcomes for PP learners (PP Vs Non-PP) and the result was even better in 2016 with the gap being only 4% down PP Vs Non-PP – an improvement of 11% from 2015.
There was also a 1% increase in the achievement of CMA PP learners against the average for Non-PP learners nationally.

																	
																	
	Gap	 	School is above National or has a smaller gap than National								
		 	School is below National or has a wider gap than National								
		 	School is equal to National or has the same gap as National